Bad Fatty Revolutionary

Good fatties, bad fatties. For a long time there have existed the stereotypes of two groups which exist within the fat acceptance movement. I think the good fatty/bad fatty debate is an important part of outlining how FA can become a more effective movement, by taking a hard look at what kind of discrimination against fat people in which our own members engage.

The worst thing for a movement is to have some members who are engaging in hypocrisy, with that hypocrisy not being condemned by the more vocal members of the movement. It creates a weak spot at which our opponents can readily plunge a rhetorical knife. I think the hypocrisy in which some of our members engage, and a hypocrisy which threatens to kill the movement or at the least make it a joke, is Healthism.

Healthism, as I define it, is the act of making health a moral imperative. That is, to be a worthwhile, contributing member of society, you should attempt to be at the best health possible. If you do not, then your worth as an individual goes down. Healthism dictates that the unhealthy are harmful, unattractive, a drain on society, stupid, and otherwise deviant.

There seems to be a dichotomy within FA, in which some members engage in and support Healthism in one way or another, and others do not. Sometimes this is political – a fundamental belief in the importance of public health at times can breed a Healthist attitude – and sometimes it is personal.

It’s my opinion that the Healthist members of FA are the ones who are stereotyped as “good fatties.” Here is my list of the most common stereotypical behaviors associated with being a “good fatty:”

  • Outlining, in detail, their exercise regime.
  • Outlining, in detail, what they eat, or saying simply, “But I eat healthy, I’m a [INSERT HEALTHIST DIETARY GROUP HERE].”
  • Being Healthist in general – that is, claiming that being healthy is an important social goal and good and should be an individual goal for everyone – but decrying fat discrimination in the next breath.
  • Hinting that if there were a safe, proven way to become thin, they would abandon their fat bodies.
  • Being personally opposed to the same deviant behavior fat-haters blame on all fat people: laziness, lack of willpower, stupidity, bad hygiene – and breathlessly reiterating over and over again that they are not one of “those” fat people (sometimes by claiming those fat people don’t exist!).
  • Being so obsessed with mythbusting they don’t realize they’re creating a sub-deviant class within the group of fat people, which isn’t protected by their brand of fat acceptance – “bad fatties.”

And here are the possibly well-known stereotypes of being a “bad fatty”:

  • Not caring about health.
  • Eating fast food more than once a month.
  • Eating convenience store snacks more than once a week.
  • Sometimes eating when they’re not hungry, or not eating when they are hungry.
  • Not paying attention to what food they are eating, and whether or not it is “healthy” by some standard or definition, or whether or not it satisfies a particular craving or it just happens to taste good at the moment.
  • Not exercising regularly, and worse, not acknowledging the importance of regular exercise as a health imperative.
  • Believing it isn’t anyone’s business what they are eating, how much they are exercising, and what constitutes their family dinners. Not recognizing a social moral imperative attached to health.
  • Not believing in public health.

Again, these are stereotypes, listed to make a point and to paint a vivid picture. Most people don’t fall neatly into these kinds of categories, adopting some or the other behaviors and viewpoints.

However, according to these lists, I’m very staunchly in the “bad fatty” category.

Why I believe the FA movement needs more vocal “bad fatty revolutionaries”:

Simply put, because the Healthist arguments subdivide fat people into “less deviant” and “more deviant” subclasses. When engaging in Healthist behaviors or making Healthist arguments, you must understand that you’re playing the fat-loathers’ game. You’re buying into their rhetoric, and agreeing with them that wanting to be healthy is indeed a moral imperative, makes a person more or less fuckable, makes an individual more or less intelligent, and so forth.

That means every myth-busting argument you put forth — “But don’t you understand that fat isn’t necessarily unhealthy?” — is played out on their turf. And you know what they can do, what they often do, that takes the wind out of our sails and stops us dead in our tracks?

Say, “You’re lying,” to whatever facts we present. “I’ve got more evidence to back up my claims,” they say, thrusting forward mountains of epidemiological studies that we’ve already debunked, convinced of our bias. “Any doctor you ask will tell you that being fat is unhealthy,” they continue, appealing to authority. “You’re just looking for an excuse to be fat,” they conclude, convinced of our bias, inexpertise, and emotional instability.

My question to all FAers out there: Why are we playing their game in the first place?

We need to change the conversation away from health. Sure, we know we can myth-bust until we’re blue in the face, and the more rigorous, less publicized evidence is overwhelmingly in support of our claims. It doesn’t matter. This is the age of science-by-press-release. Facts and hard evidence don’t have a prayer.

We need to become bad fatty revolutionaries. Instead of apologizing for behaviors that are acceptable amongst thinner people but not fatter people, instead of playing into the stereotypes and showing them that you’re an active member of their world and still fat, reject their world. Reject the moral imperative of Healthism.

Healthism is nothing more than a system of status-determination based on appearance. “You can tell whether or not someone is high or low status (read: healthy) based on how fat or thin (read: unhealthy) they are.” It’s easy. You don’t even have to know someone to know what your and his/her respective statuses are, whether or not you’re “better” than him/her. All you have to do is look.

Healthist FAers — “good fatties” — play into that game, though they slightly change the definitions. You can’t tell by just looking, they claim. You need to ask them about their exercise and nutritional regimes, perhaps their BP and blood sugar numbers, first. Perhaps also their family history of disease. Then you can make that determination. But still, status and superiority are determined — by health!

The hard truth is that Healthism hasn’t done a damned thing for the movement. Since we are in the age of science by press release, it makes us look like a bunch of crazy hypocrites. We look like we’re espousing health at the same time we are, ourselves, espousing unhealth (by accepting fat). No wonder we’re not taken seriously.

It’s time we make them play on our turf, and reject the moral imperative of health. Here are the points I suggest should be stressed:

  • Our bodies, our business.
  • Our health is between us and our doctor.
  • The concern of family members and friends for our perceived health does more harm than good.
  • We’re adults. Stop treating us as if we have the emotional and mental capacity of five year-olds. We reject your disgusting condescension.
  • Our bodies, our business. You have no right to tell me what should or should not go in my mouth. You have no right to demand that I exercise.
  • Beauty standards change. What’s fuckable today might not be fuckable tomorrow. Using body size in leiu of “health” as an excuse to determine fuckability is as capricious as using skin color, hair color, height, country of origin, religion, favorite book, etc. It’s not hard-wired, it’s a cultural creation.
  • Discrimination against fat people is always hate. Any excuse to find a fat person inferior in any way due to their fatness is bigotry. And yes, this extends to attractiveness. It might not be your fault that you’re a bigot, but you still are.
  • Grow up. What we eat and how much we exercise does not make us a more or less worthwhile person. It is not a determinant of willpower, control, sexiness, intelligence, hygeine, parental fortitude, femininity, masculinity, bravery, and so forth.
  • Our bodies, our business. Our health is between us and our doctors and yes, sometimes doctors are wrong, too. We must always be vigiliant that their techniques do more good than harm, because doctors are people, too. They can be bigots. They can make mistakes. Being informed patients is never, ever a bad thing. If we are wrong, they are free to explain to us why, or to refer us to sources so that we better understand why. Our bodies, our business. Our health, our and our doctor’s business.
  • The Obesity Epidemic is a moral panic, and the War on Obesity is a moral crusade. The torch-carriers are Healthists. Their weapons are science by press release, and the belief in the moral imperative of health.

Change the dialogue. Give up on Healthist rhetoric – it does the movement more harm than good. Make health a private matter. Don’t apologize for being fat, or qualify your status by explaining how you’re still a “good person” because you buy into the edicts of Healthism.

Our bodies, our business.

Our health, between us and our doctor, and we have a duty to be informed patients and challenge our doctors who are themselves people and therefore fallible.

Science by press release has taken facts out of the public dialogue, which ultimately dooms fat-accepting Healthist arguments.

Our bodies, our business.

We’re adults. I reject your condescension, your attempts to infantilize me which are directly connected to your desire to gain as much status over me as possible.

Healthism is a class system. It creates deviant classes which the superior classes are free to treat as subhuman and worthless. Reject Healthism. It is ultimately incompatible with fat acceptance, since it forces Healthist fat people to reject un-Healthist fat people, which is no acceptance at all.

About these ads

7 comments on “Bad Fatty Revolutionary

  1. vesta44 says:

    For me, it’s not about health, it’s about giving all fat people the basic human respect and dignity we all deserve, simply because we are human beings. That means all fat people, no matter what their health or intelligence or physical state happens to be. It means not discriminating against them just because they are fat. Why our bodies are the way they are is no one’s business and no one should have to try to change any part of themselves to meet someone else’s expectations.
    I have decided that my health is not up for discussion with anyone but my doctor. My appearance is not up for discussion with anyone, either. If it satisfies me and DH, then to hell with the rest of the world. What I eat or don’t eat, how much, when, and where is not up for discussion either, unless someone is passing along a good recipe for tasty food (and not a “lite” version of it either). Anyone who tries to ridicule me for any reason gets a hearty “Fuck You!” and is ignored from then on, unless they decide to learn how to treat me with respect. Maybe it’s part of getting older, but I just don’t feel like dealing with that kind of bullshit anymore. I have more important things to do with my time and energy than dealing with bigots of any stripe, no matter what group they happen to belong to.

  2. vesta44 says:

    Oh, and for the record, I’m probably one of the “bad” fatties too. So what? Who cares? I don’t.

  3. the Lindsay of Babble-on says:

    I imagine some folks would think i fall into one category, and other folks think i fall into the other. I probably fall somewhere in between the two, but i think trying to figure out which one i am, or which one i have been at various points in my life? Isn’t helpful: i’m not interested in figuring out what i Have Been. Rather, i’m interested in figuring out who i Am Right Now, and who i want to be In The Then.

    (Hope that made sense out of my head.)

  4. The Civil Libertarian says:

    Perfect sense, L!

    And vesta, you’re right. It just boils down to privacy and busybodies. You choose your mate, and that’s who you care about being attractive to. I think a trap many people (esp women) fall into is this trap of trying to be everything to everyone, which we know is impossible. It’s also harmful, since it puts the focus on everyone else and minimizes the self. And what happens as a result? We lose our identities and self-esteem, and become vulnerable to attacks by manipulators and bigots.

    I think it does take some experience to realize this.

  5. [...] was also a post by Big Liberty concerning being a Bad Fatty Revoluntary. I like this. I see a lot of posts on the Fat-o-sphere feed, and The Fat Liberation, about being [...]

  6. lisarutland says:

    I love this post! You’ve just managed to clarify things for me perfectly.

    I started reading about fat acceptance through studying intuitive eating, which led to the fatosphere. Now I’m hyper-aware of how people who are fat are constantly vilified with “science” being the tool of choice to excuse the bigotry. I’m very angry about that and want to add my voice to those who’re objecting. I’ve resisted though because … well, I’m a bad fatty and I feel quite ambivalent about that. After so many years it’s difficult to let go of the desire to be ‘healthy’ aka thin. But, as you say, the question is not now, nor has it ever been, about health. It’s wrong to treat any group as less, for any reason.

    I think a lot of people confuse the two issues – fat acceptance and self acceptance. The first is about our rights as an oppressed minority (huh, that’s ironic!) and the second about our own personal demons.

    • bigliberty says:

      Hi Lisa, welcome to BigLiberty!

      When I began talking about fat acceptance here (wow, I missed my one year anniversary of this blog! I should put a post up), I was in “myth-busting” mode because of how appalled I was with the misuse of science to cordon off and persecute an entire class of people (i.e., it wasn’t science at all). Being a mathematician and scientist, I sought to lend a rational voice to the discourse.

      However, after a while – perhaps seven months or so – I began to realize that, as you said, it isn’t about health at all. Health is being used as a club to silence those who swim against the stream of the latest moral crusade, the moral imperative of health. Moral crusades are ways to tease out the “good” people from the “bad” — here the “healthy” are being teased out from the “unhealthy” in the form of an easy, visual indicator of being “unhealthy” – fat.

      So that you can walk down any street and know where you fit into the hierarchical structure.

      Again, thanks for reading. :)

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s